This essay is about how important history is to learn.
A slightly longer "nutshell" summary For the most part, Wikipedia has similar strengths and weaknesses to any other encyclopedia.
Keeps up to date well. You can ask questions.
The history of an article and the process around how it was written are transparent. Articles vary wildly in quality and comprehensiveness. At any given moment, an article may be in a vandalized state rare, but not negligible. Overview of Wikipedia In a wikiarticles are never "finished". They are continually edited and usually improved over time.
In general this results in an upward trend of quality and a growing consensus over a fair and balanced representation of information. Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start. Indeed, many articles start out by giving one—perhaps not particularly evenhanded—view of the subject, and it is after a long process of discussion, debate, and argument that they gradually take on a consensus form.
Others may become caught up in a heavily unbalanced viewpoint and can take some time—months perhaps—to regain a better-balanced consensus. In part, this is because Wikipedia operates mainly on an informal process to resolve such issues.
When editors cannot agree on content and approach, it is likely to take a bit of time before more experienced editors enter the picture. Even then, on inherently controversial topics, those more experienced editors may have their own axes to grind.
The ideal Wikipedia article is balanced, neutral, and encyclopedic, containing notable verifiable knowledge. Over time, an increasing number of articles have reached this standard.
However, this process can take months or years, as each user contributes in turn. Some articles contain statements and claims that have not yet been fully cited. Others will later have entire new sections added.
Some information now in the article may be considered by later contributors to be insufficiently founded and may be removed or expanded. While the overall trend is generally upward, it is not uniformly upward.
It is important to use Wikipedia carefully if it is intended to be used as a research source. Individual articles will, by the very nature of Wikipedia, vary in standard and maturity. This page is intended to help users and researchers do this effectively.
|Health | Yahoo Lifestyle||By Elizabeth DanishIn School Time Choosing the right school for your son or daughter can be a difficult process and one that can cause a fair amount of stress if you are unsure what the best course of action is.|
|FLYBOARD RATES||Check the model essay and then read the comments. Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.|
|Nicole Richie's style weapon makes the greatest holiday gift||This is because, in each module that you study, you are expected to do a research to prompt your thinking and reasoning.|
|Automatic Bibliography Maker||Ready to fly like Iron Man or swim like a dolphin?|
See also the article Reliability of Wikipediawhich summarizes third-party studies and assessments of Wikipedia. Notable strengths of Wikipedia Main page: Why Wikipedia is so great Wikipedia has certain advantages over other reference works. Being web -based and having a very large number of active writers and editors, it provides fast coverage of many topics and provides hyperlinkingunavailable in traditional media.
Also, it often provides access to subject matter that is otherwise inaccessible in non-native languages. Since English Wikipedia editors come from all around the world, the relative lack of non-Western topics found in many Western publications is significantly less noticeable on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia often produces excellent articles about newsworthy events within days of their occurrence, such as the Wimbledon ChampionshipsLal Masjid siegeKidnapping of Alan Johnstonor the Benoit family tragedy.
Similarly, it is one of the few sites on the web even attempting neutral, objective, encyclopedic coverage of popular culture, including television series or science fiction.
In comparison with most other web-based resources, Wikipedia's open approach tremendously increases the chances that any particular factual error or misleading statement will be promptly corrected. As Wikipedia is a collaborative, ongoing project, one may also ask questions of an article's authors.
And thanks to its extensive use of hyperlinks and external links, Wikipedia can be an excellent guide to other related material, both on and off Wiki. Notable weaknesses of Wikipedia Main page: Why Wikipedia is not so great Wikipedia's most dramatic weaknesses are closely associated with its greatest strengths.
Wikipedia's radical openness means that any given article may be, at any given moment, in a bad state: While blatant vandalism is usually easily spotted and rapidly corrected, Wikipedia is certainly more subject to subtle vandalism and deliberate factual errors than a typical reference work.
Also, much as Wikipedia can rapidly produce articles on timely topics, it is also subject to remarkable oversights and omissions. There is no systematic process to make sure that "obviously important" topics are written about, so at any given time Wikipedia may be wildly out of balance in the relative attention paid to two different topics.Published: Mon, 5 Dec Single sex school is better than co-ed school as it brings more confidence to every individual.
Single sex education as known as single-gender education, is the practice of conducting education where male and female students attend separate classes or schools while co-ed school is the integrated education of males and females in the same institution. The IELTS writing task 2 sample answer below has examiner comments and is band score 9.
The topic of social media is common and this IELTS essay question was reported in the IELTS test. Legalizing Marijuana: Pros and Cons - The war on drugs is a movement of prohibition and military aid being undertaken by the United States government intended .
Here we will look at the pros and cons of single sex schools and whether they are right for you and your child. Cons of Single Sex Schools. Helped with my school essay, thanks! Zayella Reply March 4, at pm.
You're currently viewing our resources for Legal Studies. For additional assistance, you should refer to the discussion forum for this course. Below are ideas for the topic of history in IELTS writing task 2.
This essay is about how important history is to learn. This can relate to the subject of history as a whole or children spending time learning history.